Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Open Government

                                     

       President Obama committed to change the way Washington works. On his first day in Office, he signed the memorandum on transparency and open government, ushering in a new era of open and accountable government meant to bridge the gap between the American people and their government. This proves his noble intentions. He wants to cherish democracy and to take it to a new height which made him the man of history.
      Open Government (OG)  hammers what is this all about, and why it is required. OG concept does affect everyone’s life everyday in some ways. It is as fundamental to our democracy as free speech. If government records were not open to all, there would be no accountability and there would be no journalism.  In essence, there would be no democracy, as democracy was founded on the principles of openness and freedom of information.
      A lack of accountability might mean that those who hold positions of power would be more likely to abuse it. When government is open every person has the power to hold those in power accountable for following through on their promises and serving the people.
      Why is OG Important? A free and democratic society can work only if government works in the open. Access is what ensures that government officials will remain honest. It keeps us aware of how our taxes are spent and helps citizens decide whom to vote into office and whom to replace. It provides a check on government officials by providing voters with the information.
     Citizens need a constant stream of information to provide meaningful attention to the actions of government. Deprived of such information, they can’t monitor their elected and appointed leaders. And they can’t hold them accountable.
     Obama opined that for too long, the American people have experienced a culture of secrecy in Washington, where information is locked up, taxpayer dollars disappear without a trace, and lobbyists wield undue influence. For Americans, business as usual in Washington has reinforced the belief that the government benefits the special interests and the well connected at the expense of the American people. 
     On December 8, 2009, the White House issued an unprecedented open government directive requiring federal agencies to take immediate, specific steps to achieve key milestones in transparency, participation, and collaboration.  
      The directive aspires to create an unprecedented and sustained level of openness and accountability in every agency, senior leaders should strive to incorporate the values of transparency, participation, and collaboration into the ongoing work of their agency. 
      Achieving a more open government will require the various professional disciplines within the Government – such as policy, legal, procurement, finance, and technology operations – to work together to define and to develop open government solutions.  Integration of various disciplines facilitates organization-wide and lasting change in the way that Government works.  
      The transparency directive expected that Open Government Plan should explain in detail how agency will improve transparency. It should describe steps the agency will take to conduct its work more openly and publish its information online. The participation directive directed to create more informed and effective policies, the Federal Government should promote opportunities for the public to participate throughout the decision-making process. 
      On Collaboration front directive instructed that Open Government Plan should explain in detail how agency will improve collaboration, including steps the agency will take to revise its current practices to further cooperation with other Federal and non-Federal governmental agencies, the public, and non-profit and private entities in fulfilling the agency’s core mission activities.
      Addressing 65th assembly of United Nation in September 2010 President Obama emphasized “the collective call for open government: Each country will pursue a path rooted in the culture of its own people. Yet experience shows us that history is on the side of liberty; that the strongest foundation for human progress lies in open economies, open societies, and open governments. To put it simply, democracy, more than any other form of government, delivers for our citizens. And I believe that truth will only grow stronger in a world where the borders between nations are blurred.”
      He further remarked to the assembly that no one country has all the answers, but all of us must answer to our own people. In all parts of the world, we see the promise of innovation to make government more open and accountable. And now, we must build on that progress. And when we gather back here next year, we should bring specific commitments to promote transparency; to fight corruption; to energize civic engagement; to leverage new technologies so that we strengthen the foundations of freedom in our own countries, while living up to the ideals that can light the world.
      Obama’s effort was added upon by a group of passionate and committed advocates of open government. They came together on December, 2010 in Denver, Colorado for a one day unconference: CityCamp Colorado. They launched an OG initiative. This initiative is a collaborative project that includes representatives from CityCamp, OpenColorado, Codefor America and Sunlight foundation, OpenPlans and others. This initiative reflects ongoing efforts around the world and in meant to be shared with them.  
      Furthermore, a 35years old US based NGO, the TIDES launched the project “Open Government Partnership (OGP) on September 20, 2011.” This is a global effort to make governments better. Project is designed for more transparent, effective, and accountable governments-with institutions that empower citizens and are responsive to their aspirations. But this is never easy.
     The OGP formally came into life with 8 founding governments (Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, South Africa, UK, and USA) endorsed an Open Government Declaration and announced their country action plans. Since then, OGP has welcomed the commitments of 47 governments to join the Partnership.
     The OGP is a new multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from governments to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruptions and harness new technology to strengthen governance. In the spirit of multi-stakeholder collaboration, OGP is overseen by a steering committee of governments and civil society organizations.
     Initiating OG is very easy but its implementation is not- most difficult. It is a strong magnet of strong poles of easy and difficult. Hence, it attracts the public worldwide.  Its implementation is very closely associated with change of attitude and culture of officials, information holders, and custodians. Therefore it is a slow changing and time taking because of it high inertia. It is like discarding of an old era of secrecy and adopting of a new era of openness.
      Evaluating OG performance, Josh Gerstein wrote president obama’s muddy transparency record in politico on May 3, 2012. He said Obama’s Open Government Initiative had all the makings of a signature presidential accomplishment: a poor track record by his predecessor, a public commitment by the president himself and a team of White House staffers devoted to fulfilling his vision. Some of the groups that lauded Obama for his intentions have become increasingly frustrated about the administration’s record.
      Karim R. Lakhani, associate professor at Harvard Business School accompanied by
Vivek Kundra, Ex-CIO, led the case discussion for 50 technology executives in a weeklong HBS executive education course.
      Kundra observed Information is power. By "democratizing data," ordinary citizens have the ability to shift the balance of power in positive ways that can encourage innovative ideas to be developed into practical goods and services. "Washington, DC does not have a monopoly on the best ideas," he told the executives. "The public has the ability to innovate."
      He continued Data.gov allows people to be watchdogs as well as innovators. Our goal is to create a runway, a platform for innovation. The government can't make the most innovative apps. But Data.gov can be a platform.
      OG initiative is a dawn of a new era. Barack has made a noble start of this era. Inspired by him, many others like OGP project are doing excellent job to achieve OG worldwide. One should not disappoint on it performance, as it is a time taking process.
      Obama’ noble intention planted ‘OG’ tree. It bears fruits beneficial to all countries who export it. This is a political product which helped him indirectly and invisibly in winning second term. It helped his re election by convincing voters about his people oriented approach and noble intention.
      This issue is ripe now for the United Nations to take up and popularize it among member countries.  OG is in the centre of all issues. To secure desired developments and world peace, UN must adopt this agenda by getting the mandate of general assembly to include it in its core issues.
Heera Lal (views are personal and based on different sources)
Ref:
10.                        http://opengovernmentinitiative.org/
11.                        http://www.opengovpartnership.org/
12.                         http://www.tides.org/
13.                        http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2336310
15.                        http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73606.html
18.                        http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6423.html




Open Government

                                     

       President Obama committed to change the way Washington works. On his first day in Office, he signed the memorandum on transparency and open government, ushering in a new era of open and accountable government meant to bridge the gap between the American people and their government. This proves his noble intentions. He wants to cherish democracy and to take it to a new height which made him the man of history.
      Open Government (OG)  hammers what is this all about, and why it is required. OG concept does affect everyone’s life everyday in some ways. It is as fundamental to our democracy as free speech. If government records were not open to all, there would be no accountability and there would be no journalism.  In essence, there would be no democracy, as democracy was founded on the principles of openness and freedom of information.
      A lack of accountability might mean that those who hold positions of power would be more likely to abuse it. When government is open every person has the power to hold those in power accountable for following through on their promises and serving the people.
      Why is OG Important? A free and democratic society can work only if government works in the open. Access is what ensures that government officials will remain honest. It keeps us aware of how our taxes are spent and helps citizens decide whom to vote into office and whom to replace. It provides a check on government officials by providing voters with the information.
     Citizens need a constant stream of information to provide meaningful attention to the actions of government. Deprived of such information, they can’t monitor their elected and appointed leaders. And they can’t hold them accountable.
     Obama opined that for too long, the American people have experienced a culture of secrecy in Washington, where information is locked up, taxpayer dollars disappear without a trace, and lobbyists wield undue influence. For Americans, business as usual in Washington has reinforced the belief that the government benefits the special interests and the well connected at the expense of the American people. 
     On December 8, 2009, the White House issued an unprecedented open government directive requiring federal agencies to take immediate, specific steps to achieve key milestones in transparency, participation, and collaboration.  
      The directive aspires to create an unprecedented and sustained level of openness and accountability in every agency, senior leaders should strive to incorporate the values of transparency, participation, and collaboration into the ongoing work of their agency. 
      Achieving a more open government will require the various professional disciplines within the Government – such as policy, legal, procurement, finance, and technology operations – to work together to define and to develop open government solutions.  Integration of various disciplines facilitates organization-wide and lasting change in the way that Government works.  
      The transparency directive expected that Open Government Plan should explain in detail how agency will improve transparency. It should describe steps the agency will take to conduct its work more openly and publish its information online. The participation directive directed to create more informed and effective policies, the Federal Government should promote opportunities for the public to participate throughout the decision-making process. 
      On Collaboration front directive instructed that Open Government Plan should explain in detail how agency will improve collaboration, including steps the agency will take to revise its current practices to further cooperation with other Federal and non-Federal governmental agencies, the public, and non-profit and private entities in fulfilling the agency’s core mission activities.
      Addressing 65th assembly of United Nation in September 2010 President Obama emphasized “the collective call for open government: Each country will pursue a path rooted in the culture of its own people. Yet experience shows us that history is on the side of liberty; that the strongest foundation for human progress lies in open economies, open societies, and open governments. To put it simply, democracy, more than any other form of government, delivers for our citizens. And I believe that truth will only grow stronger in a world where the borders between nations are blurred.”
      He further remarked to the assembly that no one country has all the answers, but all of us must answer to our own people. In all parts of the world, we see the promise of innovation to make government more open and accountable. And now, we must build on that progress. And when we gather back here next year, we should bring specific commitments to promote transparency; to fight corruption; to energize civic engagement; to leverage new technologies so that we strengthen the foundations of freedom in our own countries, while living up to the ideals that can light the world.
      Obama’s effort was added upon by a group of passionate and committed advocates of open government. They came together on December, 2010 in Denver, Colorado for a one day unconference: CityCamp Colorado. They launched an OG initiative. This initiative is a collaborative project that includes representatives from CityCamp, OpenColorado, Codefor America and Sunlight foundation, OpenPlans and others. This initiative reflects ongoing efforts around the world and in meant to be shared with them.  
      Furthermore, a 35years old US based NGO, the TIDES launched the project “Open Government Partnership (OGP) on September 20, 2011.” This is a global effort to make governments better. Project is designed for more transparent, effective, and accountable governments-with institutions that empower citizens and are responsive to their aspirations. But this is never easy.
     The OGP formally came into life with 8 founding governments (Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, South Africa, UK, and USA) endorsed an Open Government Declaration and announced their country action plans. Since then, OGP has welcomed the commitments of 47 governments to join the Partnership.
     The OGP is a new multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from governments to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruptions and harness new technology to strengthen governance. In the spirit of multi-stakeholder collaboration, OGP is overseen by a steering committee of governments and civil society organizations.
     Initiating OG is very easy but its implementation is not- most difficult. It is a strong magnet of strong poles of easy and difficult. Hence, it attracts the public worldwide.  Its implementation is very closely associated with change of attitude and culture of officials, information holders, and custodians. Therefore it is a slow changing and time taking because of it high inertia. It is like discarding of an old era of secrecy and adopting of a new era of openness.
      Evaluating OG performance, Josh Gerstein wrote president obama’s muddy transparency record in politico on May 3, 2012. He said Obama’s Open Government Initiative had all the makings of a signature presidential accomplishment: a poor track record by his predecessor, a public commitment by the president himself and a team of White House staffers devoted to fulfilling his vision. Some of the groups that lauded Obama for his intentions have become increasingly frustrated about the administration’s record.
      Karim R. Lakhani, associate professor at Harvard Business School accompanied by
Vivek Kundra, Ex-CIO, led the case discussion for 50 technology executives in a weeklong HBS executive education course.
      Kundra observed Information is power. By "democratizing data," ordinary citizens have the ability to shift the balance of power in positive ways that can encourage innovative ideas to be developed into practical goods and services. "Washington, DC does not have a monopoly on the best ideas," he told the executives. "The public has the ability to innovate."
      He continued Data.gov allows people to be watchdogs as well as innovators. Our goal is to create a runway, a platform for innovation. The government can't make the most innovative apps. But Data.gov can be a platform.
      OG initiative is a dawn of a new era. Barack has made a noble start of this era. Inspired by him, many others like OGP project are doing excellent job to achieve OG worldwide. One should not disappoint on it performance, as it is a time taking process.
      Obama’ noble intention planted ‘OG’ tree. It bears fruits beneficial to all countries who export it. This is a political product which helped him indirectly and invisibly in winning second term. It helped his re election by convincing voters about his people oriented approach and noble intention.
      This issue is ripe now for the United Nations to take up and popularize it among member countries.  OG is in the centre of all issues. To secure desired developments and world peace, UN must adopt this agenda by getting the mandate of general assembly to include it in its core issues.
Heera Lal (views are personal and based on different sources)
Ref:
10.                        http://opengovernmentinitiative.org/
11.                        http://www.opengovpartnership.org/
12.                         http://www.tides.org/
13.                        http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2336310
15.                        http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73606.html
18.                        http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6423.html




Friday, November 30, 2012

Gujrat Election- Again Modi (Prediction)


Elections process in on in Gujart. Who will come with flying colors is a big question. Modi will repeat with majority. Just predicted USA election and it came true.
http://heeralalpcs.blogspot.in/2012/11/prediction-election-usa-2012.html
Reasons for repetition:
1.He is blame less.
2. Good political marketing manager and management with demanded political products.
3 A proven model of development, which is much in demand
4. Main opposition is weak not matching his management.
5. Able to lessen communal blame by different steps
6. His PM candidate perception/environment will help a lot to consolidate floating voters on plea to have a PM from Gujrat-Gujrat Pride. 
7. A proven administrator and political executive.
Heera Lal ( Views are personal and based on different sources)

Gujrat Election- Again Modi (Prediction)


Elections process in on in Gujart. Who will come with flying colors is a big question. Modi will repeat with majority. Just predicted USA election and it came true.
http://heeralalpcs.blogspot.in/2012/11/prediction-election-usa-2012.html
Reasons for repetition:
1.He is blame less.
2. Good political marketing manager and management with demanded political products.
3 A proven model of development, which is much in demand
4. Main opposition is weak not matching his management.
5. Able to lessen communal blame by different steps
6. His PM candidate perception/environment will help a lot to consolidate floating voters on plea to have a PM from Gujrat-Gujrat Pride. 
7. A proven administrator and political executive.
Heera Lal ( Views are personal and based on different sources)

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Barack: Democracy Promotion Champion

      Barack loves democracy and promotes it.  He championed democracy promotion. Obama supported to those seeking democracy. He opposed dictators, anti-democracy and military rulers.  Rhetoric was converted into action during presidency. He took this position as an opportunity for democracy promotion. So, he flagged it as the most important agenda of his administration and foreign policy. This he made clear in his inaugural address on January 20, 2009.

     
      President Barack said in his inaugural, “We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense.  And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken–you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.”
   
      Dating back to about 500 B.C.E., democracies existed in both Greece and Italy.
The term democracy comes from the Greek words demos, the people, and craits, to rule. Today, democracy is an abstract term that is difficult to define and can have different meanings, depending on the speaker and context. In the most common understanding, democracy generally refers to a political system with certain minimum elements: effective participation by the people (either directly or through representation) under a constitution, respect for human rights, and political equality before the law for both minorities and the majority.

      The lack of a clear definition of democracy and a comprehensive understanding
of its basic elements may have created multiple problems for U.S. policy making, according to some. Arguably, the lack of clear definition has hampered the formulation of democracy promotion policy and effective prioritizing of democracy promotion activities over the years. Also the lack of definition can complicate coordination of democracy programs and the assessment of U.S. government activities and funding. Further, without a consensus on the definition of democracy, what criteria will determine when a country has attained an acceptable level of democratic reform and no longer needs American assistance?

     9/11 attack jolted USA from inside. It was a historical turning point. The effects of the 9/11 attacks have been profound. The attacks had an extensive economic impact for the United States of America. The US government gave New York City US $20 billion as costs for the cleanup and another US $5 billion was given to the families of the victims. In addition to this, the ensuring ‘War on Terror’ has cost the US government approximately $3 trillion as Economist Josepn Stiglitz stated in 2008.
     
     In 2007, the Pew Institute’s Global Attitudes polls showed that the US was viewed unfavourably by majorities in Argentina, Bolivia and Brazil, most Western European countries and all Muslim Middle Eastern countries except for Kuwait. This poll alone shows just how much anti-US sentiment exists around the world and a large majority of the negative sentiment stemmed from the US’ reaction to the 9/11 attacks in 2001.
     
      Attack awarded Osama Bin laden public enemy No. 1. Terror and terrorist activities got the highest importance in USA priorities. Overnight counterterrorism became one of the main agenda of the administration. Prior to this, it was not. When U.S. administrations encouraged democratic reform, they have claimed that benefits for the country, its neighbours, the United States, and the world will result. Many experts believe that extending democracy can reduce terrorism while encouraging global political stability and economic prosperity.
     
      President Bush, in his second inaugural address, on January 20, 2005 said “There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom. We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in the entire world. So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”
       
       In its 2006 National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, the Bush Administration cites democracy promotion as a long-term solution for winning the War on Terror. The ADVANCE Democracy Act of 2007, or, by its more cumbersome title, the Advance Democratic Values, Address Nondemocratic Countries, and Enhance Democracy Act of 2007,was passed in August 2007 as Title XXI of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007.
      
       The ADVANCE Act was the culminating moment in a struggle extending back at least three years to institutionalize democracy promotion within the Bush administration.   Nonetheless, in the area of democracy promotion the Bush administration has bequeathed to the Obama administration a legacy worth building upon and extending.
     
       Delivering a speech in UN general assembly on September 25, 2012, President Obama spoke “It has been less than two years since a vendor in Tunisia set himself on fire to protest the oppressive corruption in his country, and sparked what became known as the Arab Spring.  And since then, the world has been captivated by the transformation that’s taken place, and the United States has supported the forces of change. We were inspired by the Tunisian protests that toppled a dictator” 
     
     Barack further said “We supported a transition of leadership in Yemen. We intervened in Libya alongside a broad coalition, and with the mandate of the United Nations Security Council. And as we meet here, we again declare that the regime of Bashar al-Assad must come to an end so that the suffering of the Syrian people can stop and a new dawn can begin.”
      He continues “These are not simply American values or Western values -- they are universal values. I am convinced that ultimately government of the people, by the people, and for the people is more likely to bring about the stability, prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace in our world.”
       So let us remember that this is a season of progress.  For the first time in decades, Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans voted for new leaders in elections that were credible, competitive, and fair. This democratic spirit has not been restricted to the Arab world. 
      Over the past year, we’ve seen peaceful transitions of power in Malawi and Senegal, and a new President in Somalia.  In Burma, a President has freed political prisoners and opened a closed society, a courageous dissident has been elected to parliament, and people look forward to further reform.  Around the globe, people are making their voices heard, insisting on their innate dignity, and the right to determine their future.
       In recent, on November 17, 2012, US President Barack Obama’s visited to both Thailand and Myanmar went symbolically well. He did all the right things in Thailand and in spite of all the reservations about Obama’s Myanmar visit, he may have sent all the right messages, particularly through the way the visit was orchestrated and his speech at Rangoon University where he talked strongly about inclusiveness. Local news reports in local papers warmly reported the visit. 

        In a briefing for reporters, Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said the White House sees the Asia Pacific as critical “to the future of the United States, both economically and in terms of our political and security objectives in the world.”  By this visit with Hillary, Barack wanted to accelerate and expedite promotion of democratic reforms in the region. 
         America is a nation composed almost entirely of immigrants. Immigrants began arriving in the Americas since at least 1492 and in what is today the United States since the early 1500s; immigrants continue to arrive five hundred and fifteen years later.
         
         Foreign policy is one yardstick among many to measure the performance of a president. Barack made democracy promotion an integral part and priorities it at top of his foreign policy. He practices it rigorously. As a result, many dictators and military rulers got mixed in dust and penalized. He proved his intention of democracy promotion on ground. Hence, he developed this issue as political product.
        
         He won third debate which was based on foreign policy. USA being an immigrant’s country, his this result-oriented effort made him popular among these voters inside the country. Outside he became liking of people and countries because he developed and sold this political product of democracy promotion. This product of democracy system is liked by mostly worldwide.
         
         Barack utilized presidency as an opportunity to become democracy promotion champion. This he developed as a political product for himself to sell. He sold it in 2012 reelection- in third debate. Obama mustered more esteem worldwide as a real democrat than before presidency. He proved it in practice. His promotional efforts helped him a lot in building election environment all around world in his favor. And finally these democracy promotional efforts brought him flying colors.

Heera Lal (Views are personal and based on different sources)

Ref:
10.                        http://forumonpublicpolicy.com/archivesum07/loupe.pdf